Postman Pat and Plotting

British 1980s children's TV is the focus of much drunken nostalgia among my generation, but I have to say that when I saw an old episode of Postman Pat recently, it was pretty boring. Pat did sod all except drive around the countryside and chat to Mrs Goggins.

My son is nearly three and, although we don't have a telly, he watches DVDs of the all-new
Postman Pat: Special Delivery Service series on my laptop. Pat's 21st-century incarnation is brilliant – each episode is action-packed, with a race against time, a heart-warmingly positive message, and a catchy soundtrack.

For those unfamiliar with
Postman Pat: SDS, a quick description of the average episode might be in order. Pat is talking to his son Julian, when his mobile phone rings and poor Julian faces the potentially life-scarring knowledge that his dad's job is more important than he is. The caller is always Pat's boss, Ben, asking him to do a Special Delivery – and this one's urgent! All deliveries are somewhere within a one-mile radius of the mail centre, so Pat and his black and white cat, Jess (still sprightly after nearly 30 years), set off in one of their vehicles – van, motorbike or even helicopter. A variety of mishaps conspires to stop Pat reaching his destination (more often than not, involving a certain amount of incompetence on his part) but the Special Delivery Service ALWAYS gets through. Pat delivers the parcel with seconds to spare, and is everybody's hero.

So what does this have to do with writing?

The episodes aren't realistic – as far as I know, small Cumbrian towns don't have Flying Machine competitions involving a rocket that can be accidentally launched by a sheep, and if real postmen got into half the scrapes Pat lands in, they'd get the sack – but the stories work within their own logic. The plots are well thought out and even the unrealistic events are believable because they are set up well in advance – something I believe is vitally important in a novel.

When Pat needs a fishing rod to rescue a lost teddy bear from the river, you can be sure that a few scenes earlier we'll have seen Ted Glen fishing further along the bank. When a magpie needs to be tempted with food, there will already have been a character munching on a sandwich. Such tiny details appear insignificant while they're happening – but then they suddenly have a bearing on the plot. When they're needed, they are in place – we don't get jolted out of the story by Pat announcing that he just conveniently happens to have a fishing line in the van.

The world of a novel doesn't have to be realistic either, and it could be argued that it
shouldn't be. Real life, after all, doesn't have a plot – it's just one damn thing after another. Fiction is different. It needs a greater intricacy, and part of that intricacy involves making the reader look back and think – 'of course! That's the parcel that was on the sideboard in the first chapter!'

I find even unexpected events more satisfying if they evolve from what has gone before and aren't just parachuted in from nowhere. A surprise can be even more of a surprise if the reader is given a clue but doesn't pick up on it at the time. Children's TV writers know this, and there's a lot we can learn from them.


With thanks to RottenLittlePony on Flickr for the image, reproduced under a Creative Commons Licence.


Old Kitty said...


I was nearly getting upset thinking - oh no - poor Postman Pat and his newly re-incarnated 21st century self being much maligned and unfairly criticised!Think of the children!


Silly me.

Sometimes I wish real life would just imitate art! Then again it'll make writing stories less exciting.

Great post, thank you.

Take care

Caroline Green said...

I am more of a Fireman Sam woman myself. Pure genius, that've got naughty Norman Price and the hapless Elvis Criddlington among other great characters. No, cannot be converted!

Great post, Caro

Gillian McDade said...

I love Jess. Jess is so cool! A very interesting blog, Caroline. It's made me recall many of the shows I watched as a child.

Helen Black said...

With regard to how far you can stretch credibilty, I think it's very far, provided you respect your reader.

A friend of mine says he asks himself not, does this happen, but could it happen. I think that's a good rule of thumb for the sort of stuff I do.

DT said...

Good points and well made.
Strange to think that Pat's all grown up with a family of his own. There's still every hope of the Wooden Tops making a comeback then, as the Perspexes or the CGIs.

Roderic Vincent said...

"There's still every hope of the Wooden Tops making a comeback then, as the Perspexes or the CGIs."


Geraldine Ryan said...

Someone once suggested introducing a random object into a story, that you, the writer, personally couldn't see the point of when you introduce it - a fishing rod, for example, or a sandwich. But as you go on with your story something happens - the magic of writing, call it - and before you know it, that fishing rod or that sandwich suddenly evolves into being part of the plot. I do this a lot now, when I only have a bit of an idea and I'm not sure what direction the story's going to go in and it always enriches the story.

Jenzarina said...

Can't wait for Button Moon to meet 24.

Great post.

Susie Nott-Bower said...

Maybe someone (you?) should write a book about these kinds of devices which are more subtle than the 'obvious' ones, yet necessary for writers to reflect on.
I laughed that the first comment is by Old Kitty - are you Jess's doppelganger?!

DT said...

Button Moon unzipped - the adult years ...